Main Privacy Policy DMCA Contacts
» » The Church - Priest = Aura

The Church - Priest = Aura Album

Church Plain Recordings Alternative Rock 2016
The Church - Priest = Aura Album
Performer: The Church
Title: Priest = Aura
Country: US
Genre: Rock Music
Style:Alternative Rock
Released: 03 Mar 2016
Catalog number: plain207
Label: Plain Recordings
MP3 album szie: 2451 mb
FLAC album size: 1970 mb
Download MP3 Download FLAC

Tracklist

1The Disillusionist6:24
2Aura6:59
3Old Flame1:37
4Kings4:35
5Dome4:00
6Chaos9:34
7Mistress4:12
8Ripple6:03
9Swan Lake2:26
10Witch Hunt1:27
11Paradox3:59
12Film3:56
13Feel3:55
14Lustre5:45

Versions

CategoryArtistTitle (Format)LabelCategoryCountryYear
07822-18683-2The Church Priest = Aura ‎(CD, Album)Arista07822-18683-2US1992
TVC 93356, RMC53356The Church Priest = Aura ‎(Cass, Album, Chr)Mushroom, Mushroom, White , White TVC 93356, RMC53356Australia1992
ARCD-8683The Church Priest = Aura ‎(CD, Album)AristaARCD-8683US1992
TVD93356, C 11098The Church Priest = Aura ‎(CD, Album + Cass, Single)White , White TVD93356, C 11098Australia1992
07822-18683-4The Church Priest = Aura ‎(Cass, Album)Arista07822-18683-4Canada1992

Credits

  • Art Direction – Maude Gilman
  • Performer – Jay Dee Daugherty, Marty Willson-Piper, Peter Koppes, Steven Kilbey
  • Photography By – David Katzenstein
  • Producer – Gavin MacKillop, The Church
  • Recorded By – Gavin MacKillop
  • Typography [Lettering] – John Wujcik
  • Written-By – Daugherty (tracks: A1-A3, B1-B3, C1 to D2), Willson-Piper, Koppes, Kilbey
  • Art Direction – Maude Gilman
  • Performer – Jay Dee Daugherty, Marty Willson-Piper, Peter Koppes, Steven Kilbey
  • Photography By – David Katzenstein
  • Producer – Gavin MacKillop, The Church
  • Recorded By – Gavin MacKillop
  • Typography [Lettering] – John Wujcik
  • Written-By – Daugherty (tracks: A1-A3, B1-B3, C1 to D2), Willson-Piper, Koppes, Kilbey

Notes

℗ 1992 & © 1992, 2016 Arista Records, LLC.
All songs published by Sony Music Publishing Australia, adm. by Sony Tunes Inc. (ASCAP)/ Worldwater Music adm. by PSO Ltd. (ASCAP)/Copyright Control

Barcodes

  • Barcode (Text): 6 46315 52071 2
  • Barcode (Scanned): 646315520712

Companies

  • Phonographic Copyright (p) – Arista Records LLC
  • Copyright (c) – Arista Records LLC
  • Manufactured For – Runt Productions, LLC
  • Manufactured By – Sony Music Entertainment

Short intro

The Church - Dome. With lowered commercial expectations and less pressure from Arista Records, the atmosphere was more relaxed than the fraught L. Rock 1992. Songs in album The Church - Priest Aura 1992. If not as gloriously catchy as Heyday, Priest Aura shows the Church fully in charge of creating evocative, poetic, and gripping music with a distinctly unsettling edge. Type Album. Released date March 1992. Members owning this album3. Формируйте собственную коллекцию записей The Aura. The Church - Mistress. The Church - Kings. Part of the strength of Priest Aura is its excellent sequencing, organized from start to finish. After touring their previous album, Gold Afternoon Fix 1990, with new drummer Jay Dee Daugherty Patti Smith Group, The Church returned to Sydney's Studios 301 to commence work on new material. Priest Aura styled as priest aura is the eighth album by the Australian alternative rock band The Church, released in March 1992. To favorites 2 Download album. The Church - Priest Aura 1992. 14 tracks 64:52. The Church. The Church - Feel. It peaked at No. The Church - Lustre. This is Paradox, by the church, from their 1992 album Priest Aura. Album Name priest aura. Kaleidotonic video by free to The Church Priest Aura Aura, Ripple and more. 25 on the ARIA Albums Chart. The Church - Ripple. The Church - Paradox. The Church - Aura. After touring their previous album, Gold Afternoon Fix 1990, with new drummer Jay Dee Daugherty Patti Smith Group, The Church returned to Sydney's Studios 301 to commence work on new material. Priest Aura is a music studio album recording by THE CHURCH Prog RelatedProgressive Rock released in 1992 on cd, lp, vinyl andor cassette. Essential: a masterpiece of rock music36. The opening song, Aura, finds the band coming in after an atmospheric synth start, Kilbey's sly lyric equally applicable to the band's recent situation and standing as a cryptic invocation of strange experiences away from home. Album 1992 14 Songs. Alternative Rock Post-Punk. Listen album. Priest Aura. Music StyleNew-Wave. Labels Mushroom Records Arista. The Church - Swan Lake. The opening song, Aura, finds the band coming in after an atmospheric synth start, Kilbey's sly lyric equally applicable to the band's recent situation and standing as a cryptic invocation of strange experiences away from home
Tell Friends!

Related to The Church - Priest = Aura
Reviews: (26)
Eta
Eta
I only have the original CD to compare it to but I'm perfectly happy with the Plain reissue - artwork is as cheap and cheerful as the original but the sound is crisp and full on my system
Dog_Uoll
Dog_Uoll
Hmm...mine sounds perfect. Balanced, clean. Guess I lucked out. Cheers
I am hcv men
I am hcv men
Has anyone compared the vinyl reissue's sound to 2005 Australia EMI remaster (not vinyl)? That is the by far the best I have heard, I believe it was done by Tim Powles, the band's drummer. Steve Kilbey was recently quoted as saying that this remastered LP was not put out by the band and isn't even sure if they get paid anything for it. I have the original LP and would be willing to buy this anyway if the quality is on par with the 2005 remaster. Edit: it looks from the other comments that this isn't worthy. Still interested in hearing if anyone has a comparison to the 2005 (not vinyl) remaster.
Samulkree
Samulkree
I recently acquired some really good headphones and I now agree with you.
Moswyn
Moswyn
As a huge fan of this record and as a sound quality lover, I am afraid I have to disagree with you. The 2005 remaster was a disaster; distorted, brick-walled, loud and compressed. Thanks to that CD I learned about the loudness war and how most remasters of the era don't sound half as good as the original versions. Give your original CD or LP another good listen and compare it to the 2005 remaster, you'll hear the difference. Use a good pair of headphones if you can. I can't comment on this pressing but if they stayed away from the 2005 remaster, there is hope.
Charyoll
Charyoll
Just purchased this as it's probably my favourite Church album and i could never afford the original vinyl pressing.My first impression was that the drums have been pushed back slightly in the mix ,compared to the CD ... especially noticeable on the first track. Overall though, it sounds ok ... it's hard to know exactly how much tweaking was done with the mastering to vinyl.Anyway, the first record played through pretty well without too much static or ticking ; just a little between tracks.The second record however has quite a bit of static and distortion from halfway through 'Dome' (side C) right through to the end of the side. Side D has patches of static.I cleaned the vinyls before playing and checked my stylus.The static appears in the same areas with each play so it must be in the pressing. Such a shame ! It's always depressing when you pay top dollar for a new pressing of a favourite album, only to find it to be defective.Cover is a minimal single sleeve outer with printed barcode, housing two plain white inner paper sleeves. About as minimal as you can get. The reproduction of the silver on black front image is reasonably good though.
Elildelm
Elildelm
I have the original and the new double-LP reissue. My copy of the reissue sounds great! The mastering sounds great to my ears, and I am often a critic of new remasters. No over-compression or brickwalling - very dynamic. Nice clean highs, warm round bass and kick. Side by side, I think the new issue holds its own very well. There is a slight bit of surface noise at a few points where the music is very quiet, but it may be a matter of needing a good cleaning. That shouldn't be required on a new record, but it often is.
Akinonris
Akinonris
I have not done an A/B comparison with my original copy, but my first impression is that the mastering is actually pretty solid. And surprisingly my pressing is pretty good by any standard and very good for a Plain press. Much better than I was expecting.
Felhann
Felhann
I though the mastering wasn't too bad - but the pressing was terrible.
Yozshujind
Yozshujind
I own the original, but I decided to buy this reissue hoping that it might sound better than expected since it is spread across two pieces of vinyl. The disappointment set in shortly after dropping the needle. Muddy bass. None of the highs sparkle. Dull sounding overall. This record deserves better treatment.
Kizshura
Kizshura
You right I have both and I prefer the originalIssue
Tinavio
Tinavio
bummer. I also own an original and bought this as well thinking for $30 it was worth the gamble. Still haven't listened to this reissue but was expecting what you described but hoping to be surprised. Plain Recordings has a nice catalog of reissues but always manages to drop the ball.
Samulkis
Samulkis
Such a great album, Shame that plain is repressing this.
Thetalen
Thetalen
I only have the original CD to compare it to but I'm perfectly happy with the Plain reissue - artwork is as cheap and cheerful as the original but the sound is crisp and full on my system
Phallozs Dwarfs
Phallozs Dwarfs
Hmm...mine sounds perfect. Balanced, clean. Guess I lucked out. Cheers
LadyShlak
LadyShlak
Has anyone compared the vinyl reissue's sound to 2005 Australia EMI remaster (not vinyl)? That is the by far the best I have heard, I believe it was done by Tim Powles, the band's drummer. Steve Kilbey was recently quoted as saying that this remastered LP was not put out by the band and isn't even sure if they get paid anything for it. I have the original LP and would be willing to buy this anyway if the quality is on par with the 2005 remaster. Edit: it looks from the other comments that this isn't worthy. Still interested in hearing if anyone has a comparison to the 2005 (not vinyl) remaster.
Gela
Gela
I recently acquired some really good headphones and I now agree with you.
melody of you
melody of you
As a huge fan of this record and as a sound quality lover, I am afraid I have to disagree with you. The 2005 remaster was a disaster; distorted, brick-walled, loud and compressed. Thanks to that CD I learned about the loudness war and how most remasters of the era don't sound half as good as the original versions. Give your original CD or LP another good listen and compare it to the 2005 remaster, you'll hear the difference. Use a good pair of headphones if you can. I can't comment on this pressing but if they stayed away from the 2005 remaster, there is hope.
Flamehammer
Flamehammer
Just purchased this as it's probably my favourite Church album and i could never afford the original vinyl pressing.My first impression was that the drums have been pushed back slightly in the mix ,compared to the CD ... especially noticeable on the first track. Overall though, it sounds ok ... it's hard to know exactly how much tweaking was done with the mastering to vinyl.Anyway, the first record played through pretty well without too much static or ticking ; just a little between tracks.The second record however has quite a bit of static and distortion from halfway through 'Dome' (side C) right through to the end of the side. Side D has patches of static.I cleaned the vinyls before playing and checked my stylus.The static appears in the same areas with each play so it must be in the pressing. Such a shame ! It's always depressing when you pay top dollar for a new pressing of a favourite album, only to find it to be defective.Cover is a minimal single sleeve outer with printed barcode, housing two plain white inner paper sleeves. About as minimal as you can get. The reproduction of the silver on black front image is reasonably good though.
POFOD
POFOD
I have the original and the new double-LP reissue. My copy of the reissue sounds great! The mastering sounds great to my ears, and I am often a critic of new remasters. No over-compression or brickwalling - very dynamic. Nice clean highs, warm round bass and kick. Side by side, I think the new issue holds its own very well. There is a slight bit of surface noise at a few points where the music is very quiet, but it may be a matter of needing a good cleaning. That shouldn't be required on a new record, but it often is.
Aradwyn
Aradwyn
I have not done an A/B comparison with my original copy, but my first impression is that the mastering is actually pretty solid. And surprisingly my pressing is pretty good by any standard and very good for a Plain press. Much better than I was expecting.
Yla
Yla
I though the mastering wasn't too bad - but the pressing was terrible.
Bev
Bev
I own the original, but I decided to buy this reissue hoping that it might sound better than expected since it is spread across two pieces of vinyl. The disappointment set in shortly after dropping the needle. Muddy bass. None of the highs sparkle. Dull sounding overall. This record deserves better treatment.
Naa
Naa
You right I have both and I prefer the originalIssue
saafari
saafari
bummer. I also own an original and bought this as well thinking for $30 it was worth the gamble. Still haven't listened to this reissue but was expecting what you described but hoping to be surprised. Plain Recordings has a nice catalog of reissues but always manages to drop the ball.
The Sphinx of Driz
The Sphinx of Driz
Such a great album, Shame that plain is repressing this.